|
| |
DLTC INFO MEMO 2008-07
STATE OF
WISCONSIN
Department of Health Services
DDES Info Memo Series
2008 – 07
Division of Long Term Care
Date: July 8, 2008
Index Title: LTC Fiscal
Update
Memo # 8
To:
Listserv
For:
County Departments of Human Services Departments
County Departments of Social Services Directors
County 51 Directors
County Fiscal Contacts
County COP and Waiver Coordinators
Children’s Services Specialists
From:
Sinikka Santala
Administrator
Subject:
LTC Fiscal Update Memo #8
The purpose of
this memo is to clarify and reiterate information previously provided to
counties regarding the use of State General Purpose Revenue (GPR)
allocations for eligible waiver costs during the period of transition
into Family Care.
Background
As previously
detailed in LTC Fiscal Update Memo #1, funding for CIP 1A, CIP 1B, BIW,
CIP II, and COP waiver programs are now treated as an allocation to
counties. This change, effective January 1, 2008, allows counties
greater flexibility in the use of their funding for the adult long-term
care waiver programs by no longer limiting counties to serve only the
same number of persons as slots allocated for each of the programs.
Counties receive an allocation for each of the waiver programs based on
the current number of slots that they have, the rate for each of these
slots, and the total number of days in the contract year.
A county’s
allocation for any of the waiver programs can increase or decrease
throughout the calendar year based on waiver activity. For example, if a
county has a new relocation under CIP 1A or ICF-MR restructuring, the
allocation for the corresponding waiver would be increased. Similarly,
if a county has someone vacate a BIW slot, that waiver’s allocation
would be decreased. Allocation increases and decreases will continue to
occur as they have in the past, and are calculated based on the number
of people added to (or removed from) the waiver, their rate, and the
number of days remaining in the calendar year.
By removing
slot restrictions, counties gain flexibility within the programs.
Counties are no longer required to request changes between slots to fill
vacant slots within programs, are not held to the current “slot
value,” and do not need to return funding for unused days. Instead, if
counties have allowable expenses reported in HSRS for the program, they
will be paid up to the amount of their allocations. However, this does not
mean that the entire allocation may be spent, if the county is also
transitioning to Family Care. It should also be noted that transfers
between waiver programs (such as a transfer between CIP 1A and CIP IB)
still require Department approval.
Transitioning
to Family Care
Waiver
contract language addressing the transition to managed long-term care
states: “As the (waiver program name) participants transition into
managed long-term care, a county’s (waiver program name) allocation
will be reduced to reflect individuals who are no longer being served
under the (waiver program name), and are instead being served through
the Family Care program.” These LTC waiver contract reductions also
apply as persons opt to transition out of the traditional LTC waivers
(CIP, COP, etc.) to the new Self-Directed Supports (SDS) waiver.
Waiver
contracts will be reduced after counties complete the transition of
waiver participants into Family Care, allowing the programs to remain
fully-funded during the transition period and facilitating an accurate
settlement process that
will be based on the county’s actual transition experience. The Family
Care funding model assumes that the county fully supports locally-funded
waiver clients until their transfer into Family Care (a “maintenance
of effort” during the transition process). Accordingly, the waiver
contract reduction performed after the county’s transition of waiver
participants is complete will take into account both the speed of the
county’s transition and the existing mix of State-funded and locally
funded participants.
While the
county currently receives waiver funding from the State in the form of
an allocation, the amount of the allocation is determined by calculating
the number of people served in State slots, times their individual
rates, times the number of days in one year. In order to ensure that
counties receive an appropriate level of support for the number of
State-supported slots over the period of transition without requiring
fiscal staff to track member-by-member transitions to Family Care over
the estimated six-month waiver participant enrollment period,
post-transition contract reductions will be estimated using
the entire waiver participant pool, and assuming county maintenance
of effort.
The adjustment
method identifies the total number of people (both State and locally
funded) being served under each waiver at the beginning of the
transition, and divides the entire GPR allocation amount by the total
number of people and the number of days in a year (366 in CY08) to
determine an average GPR allocation per diem. Contract reductions
calculated after the transition of all waiver participants will be equal
to this per diem, times the number of individuals leaving that waiver
program, times the number of days remaining in the year. This method
will ensure that that the county receives a stable and proportional
amount of GPR for State-supported waiver participants over the course of
the transition, without requiring the county to track which enrollees
are supported by State versus local funding.
Example
County A
participates in the CIP 1B waiver. At the beginning of the county’s
transition to Family Care, there are 6 individuals in CIP 1B
State-supported slots, each having a daily rate of $200. The county’s
calendar year allocation from the State for CIP 1B is $439,200 (6
participants times $200 per day times 366 days in 2008). The county also
serves 6 individuals in locally-supported CIP 1B slots, each having a
daily rate of $100. Assuming a maintenance of effort, the county would
expect to budget $219,600 for these individuals in 2008 (6 participants
times $100 per day times 366 days in 2008). Given these assumptions, the
county could expect the following costs for 2008, before transition to
Family Care:
|
Month
|
Enrollees
|
Cost
- State
|
Cost
- Local
|
Total
|
|
January
|
12
|
$37,200
|
$18,600
|
$55,800
|
|
February
|
12
|
$34,800
|
$17,400
|
$52,200
|
|
March
|
12
|
$37,200
|
$18,600
|
$55,800
|
|
April
|
12
|
$36,000
|
$18,000
|
$54,000
|
|
May
|
12
|
$37,200
|
$18,600
|
$55,800
|
|
June
|
12
|
$36,000
|
$18,000
|
$54,000
|
|
July
|
12
|
$37,200
|
$18,600
|
$55,800
|
|
August
|
12
|
$37,200
|
$18,600
|
$55,800
|
|
September
|
12
|
$36,000
|
$18,000
|
$54,000
|
|
October
|
12
|
$37,200
|
$18,600
|
$55,800
|
|
November
|
12
|
$36,000
|
$18,000
|
$54,000
|
|
December
|
12
|
$37,200
|
$18,600
|
$55,800
|
|
|
|
$439,200
|
$219,600
|
$658,800
|
Beginning in
January, County A transitions to Family Care. The transition plan
assumes that 1/6 of the waiver participants will enroll in managed care
each month, effective the first of the month. In this example, as
one-half of the waiver participants are State-funded and one-half are
locally-funded, the enrollment plan assumes that half of each month’s
Family Care enrollees will come from State-supported slots, and half
from county supported slots. During transition, the county’s CIP 1B
anticipated cost plan will now look like this:
|
|
Waiver
|
Family
Care
|
Cost
|
Cost
|
Cost
|
|
|
Month
|
Enrollees
|
Enrollees
|
(State)
|
(Local)
|
(Family
Care)
|
Total
|
|
January
|
10
|
2
|
$31,000
|
$15,500
|
$9,300
|
$55,800
|
|
February
|
8
|
4
|
$23,200
|
$11,600
|
$17,400
|
$52,200
|
|
March
|
6
|
6
|
$18,600
|
$9,300
|
$27,900
|
$55,800
|
|
April
|
4
|
8
|
$12,000
|
$6,000
|
$36,000
|
$54,000
|
|
May
|
2
|
10
|
$6,200
|
$3,100
|
$46,500
|
$55,800
|
|
June
|
0
|
12
|
$0
|
$0
|
$54,000
|
$54,000
|
|
July
|
0
|
12
|
$0
|
$0
|
$55,800
|
$55,800
|
|
August
|
0
|
12
|
$0
|
$0
|
$55,800
|
$55,800
|
|
September
|
0
|
12
|
$0
|
$0
|
$54,000
|
$54,000
|
|
October
|
0
|
12
|
$0
|
$0
|
$55,800
|
$55,800
|
|
November
|
0
|
12
|
$0
|
$0
|
$54,000
|
$54,000
|
|
December
|
0
|
12
|
$0
|
$0
|
$55,800
|
$55,800
|
|
|
|
| | |