DHS

 

Wisconsin Department of Health Services

Information memos

Numbered memos

Subscribe for email notification of each new memo

 

DDES INFO MEMO 2005-04

April 7, 2005

TO: 
County Inpatient Psychiatric Hospitals

CC: 
Area Administrators/Assistant Area Administrators
County Departments of Human Services Directors
County Departments of Social Services Directors
County Department of Community Program Directors
County Mental Health and AODA Coordinators
CSP Directors and CSP Coordinators
DDES, Bureau of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services
DDES, Bureau of Quality Assurance
Directors, DDES Mental Health Institutes
Grass Roots Empowerment Program
ISP Directors and Coordinators
Mental Health Association of Milwaukee
Mental Health Consumer Organizations
NAMI Wisconsin and Local Chapters
Trempealeau County IMD
Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy
Wisconsin Council on Mental Health
Wisconsin Family Ties

From: 
Sinikka Santala
Administrator

Re: 
Promotion of Recovery and Healing within the Mental Health Treatment Culture without the Need to Use Seclusion and Restraints in County Inpatient Psychiatric Units/Hospitals

I. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY.
The purpose of this information memo is to serve as a best practice guide for County operated inpatient psychiatric units/hospitals for the promotion of recovery and healing within mental health treatment without the need to use seclusion and restraint. A draft of the memo has been shared with representatives of county inpatient psychiatric units/hospitals and modified, based on comments received.

DDES has already taken action in its own psychiatric inpatient facilities by issuing a DDES policy directive to Mendota Mental Health Institute and Winnebago Mental Health Institute that are involved in the effort to reduce and eventually eliminate the need to use seclusion and restraint.

II. OVERVIEW.

A. Philosophy and Vision

The vision of DDES is to promote recovery and healing within the mental health treatment culture that is free from violence and coercion. This is accomplished through the development of partnerships with consumers, in an atmosphere of dignity and respect. A draft of this memo has been shared with representatives of county inpatient psychiatric units/hospitals and modified based on comments received.

Within this philosophy, mission, vision, and values, the public mental health system must have the goal of reduction and eventual elimination of the need to use seclusion and restraint in treatment settings. This requires a change in the "culture of care" that is based upon a shared vision and values.

A team of DDES institute management and union staff, central office staff, county hospital staff, consumers, advocates and family members have articulated this vision. These shared values guide and direct the actions of the administrative and treatment staff in providing active treatment while maintaining the safety of all individuals.

We recommend that the public mental health system adheres to the following shared core values in this effort:

  • We believe in the principles and values of recovery, and the importance of developing a culture of recovery.
  • We believe that individualized treatment works and supports people in their recovery process.
  • We believe that the key to a successful treatment program is the active collaboration between service provider and person served.
  • We believe in the expectation that leadership, at every level, sets a standard for positive interactions.
  • We believe that the leadership is responsible for setting measurable standards and providing a system for monitoring these outcomes and offering regular feedback to staff and patients/consumers on the progress.
  • We believe staff training begins with a common understanding and appreciation of the vision and then mastering communication skills to develop therapeutic alliances. Our success at fostering an environment free of violence and coercion depends on increased understanding of patients' rights, the development of improved staff communication skills and verbal de-escalation skills and safe physical management techniques in situations where there is risk of physical injury or harm.
  • We believe that merely expressing anger or distress does not require the use of a restrictive measure.
  • We believe that successful reduction in the use of seclusion and restraints requires a basic and profound respect for every patient/consumer and caregiver.
  • We believe that the use of seclusion or restraint is not treatment.

The Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, Division of Disability and Elder Services is in full support of the national trend to reduce restrictive procedures. DDES recognizes that movement toward restraint-free facilities involves major system changes that require changes in values, beliefs, and practices. In furthering this effort toward restraint-free facilities, the Division of Disability and Elder Services is issuing this best practice guideline to county operated inpatient psychiatric units.

B. Background

Seclusion and restraint have in the past been viewed as a therapeutic mechanism to decrease agitation or aggression and to maintain safety in psychiatric hospitals. The current use of seclusion and restraint is a product of the treatment system's history in which the use of seclusion and restraint as a safety measure was thought to be necessary and a therapeutic technique. This belief was taught and promulgated from teachers, colleagues, co-workers, and mentors, as staff prepared for careers in mental health. Its use became part of the inherited culture of mental health care.

Risks associated with the use of seclusion and restraint include, but are not limited to: accidental death, injuries, emotional harm to staff and consumer, disruption of the therapeutic alliance, and exposing the consumer, his/her family and staff involved to further trauma. DDES recognizes the use of seclusion and restraint is a reflection of this historical, but limited model and culture of care, based on the erroneous belief that the use of restrictive procedures are therapeutic and has therapeutic value.

Overcoming this cultural acceptance of seclusion and restraint as part of the treatment process can be the biggest obstacle in reducing the use of these procedures. Facilities that have been successful in reducing and eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint have recognized and addressed this cultural change as the first step in accomplishing the goal. In recent years, Wisconsin has been involved in a national movement toward the reduction in the use of seclusion and restraint in health care facilities.

III. PROCEDURES.

STRATEGIES FOR CREATING HEALING/THERAPEUTIC ENVIRONMENTS THAT RESULT IN THE REDUCTION AND EVENTUAL ELIMINATION OF THE NEED OF SECLUSION AND RESTRAINT

A. CONCEPTUALIZING CHANGE IN PRACTICE - THE PUBLIC HEALTH MODEL

Those states that have been very successful in reducing the use of seclusion and restraints have adopted the public health model as a strategy. The Public Health Model is a three-stage model of disease prevention and includes a health promotion focus. Stage one, primary prevention includes interventions aimed at preventing and reducing the need for seclusion and restraint. Stage two, secondary prevention includes early interventions designed to minimize and quickly resolve conflicts if they occur, using the least restrictive method possible to avoid the use of seclusion and restraint. Stage three, tertiary prevention includes those interventions that attempt to repair harm and minimize the negative effects when seclusion or restraint is used. The health promotion aspect of the Public Health Model includes the collaborative development of healthy coping skills.

The process of change is conceptualized to include leaderships' responsibility to provide the education, training, experience, and tools necessary for staff to provide and maintain coercion and violence free environments.

B. PRIMARY PREVENTION

1. LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE CHANGE
Leaders create culture and it is their responsibility to change it. Organizational culture refers to the basic values, norms, beliefs, and practices that characterize the functioning of an institution. At the most basic level, organizational culture defines the assumptions that employees make as they carry out their work, it defines "the way we do things here." Culture is a powerful force that can persist through reorganizations and the change of essential personnel. It can be a positive or a negative force.

Leadership, not direct care staff, is responsible for the organization's use of seclusion and restraint. Leadership has the authority to make the changes necessary for success by making seclusion and restraint reduction a high priority, reducing or eliminating organizational barriers, providing the necessary resources, and holding people accountable for their actions. The role of leadership is the most important component in a successful seclusion and restraint reduction initiative.

To reduce the use of seclusion and restraint, leadership defines, communicates, the vision, values, and implements an action plan. This begins with re-characterizing the use of seclusion and restraint as a crisis, a high-risk and problem-prone intervention, which can be dangerous for patients/consumers and staff. The use of seclusion and restraint is a risk management and performance improvement issue, requiring daily specific executive oversight.

Leadership addresses the organizations culture issues based upon the most profound respect and belief that recovery is possible. Leadership establishes a positive culture of healing, characterized by tolerance, listening, empathy/compassion, respect, safety, trust, and cultural competence. A positive culture of healing is established and maintained through empowered professionals, collaborative and participatory relationships, patient/consumer rights, and staff engagement in support of the patient/consumer's recovery.

Lastly, leadership must consolidate and institutionalize the changes and approaches, while reinvigorating the seclusion and restraint reduction initiative with new projects, themes, and change agents. Credibility of the initiative is achieved by changing systems, structures, and policies that do not fit the vision, while hiring, promoting, recognizing and developing employees that can implement the vision.

2. BUILDING THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCES
DDES recognizes that relationships between the consumer and direct care staff ultimately makes the biggest difference for developing an environment where a positive culture of healing can flourish. The goal is to influence consumers' beliefs, values and trust that recovery is possible. It is believed that when staff exhibit genuine hope and a belief in the recovery of patients/consumers, it can be a critical ingredient toward the person's improvement.

The therapeutic impact of the direct care staff depends upon the therapeutic relationship, therapeutic alliance, and specific therapeutic skill sets. Therapeutic relationships involve a caring, respectful relationship between the consumer and direct care staff, in which staff maintains appropriate boundaries while supporting the consumer toward recovery. A therapeutic alliance involves the focused use of the therapeutic relationship in collaboration with the consumer, to help the person identify and achieve individualized treatment goals, improve socialization and support recovery. Therapeutic skill sets are tools used by direct care staff to engage, motivate, support, problem solve, and de-escalate the consumer.

Direct care staff achieves a therapeutic alliance by using comprehensive individualized information about each consumer, strength based mindset, and strength based actions. A strength-based mindset requires that leadership supports the direct care staffs' sense of mission, self, professionalism, and awareness of their influence on consumers. Direct care staff may not be aware of how strong an impact their interventions and responses, both positive and negative, actually have on consumers.

A strengths-based mindset uses specific means to achieve and maintain a therapeutic relationship. This includes, but is not limited to, active listening, seeking clarification, conveying respect, offering empathy, and being genuine, accessible, and non-intimidating. Strength-based mindsets support consumers' interests and strengths, while positively supporting consumer efforts at coping and learning. Strength-based orientation uses a balanced recognition of strengths to motivate and mobilize. Direct care staff restores hope and a sense of efficacy, employing on-going attention to the treatment plan and using regular, respectful feedback to the consumer. Direct care staff also requests feedback from the consumer, and uses this feedback to learn and improve.

A strength-based action set employs the therapeutic use of self to engage, know, support, model, mentor, and instill hope. This action set encourages, motivates, and draws upon teachable moments to assist consumers in attaining treatment goals, learn coping skills, and improve their quality of life. Using a consumer's own words, whenever possible, direct care staff emphasizes self-determination through collaboration. The language of hope is used to convey belief and expectation for positive change. Strength-based actions avoid shaming, blaming, or comparing consumers.

3. TRAUMA INFORMED CARE
DDES supports the use of trauma-informed mental health care based upon the latest research literature. Trauma-informed care, grounded by a thorough understanding of the neurological, biological, psychological and social effects of trauma and violence, provides direction for mental health care. This care, informed by research and evidence of effective practice, recognizes that coercive interventions can cause traumatization and re-traumatization and are to be avoided.

Features of trauma-informed mental health care includes recognition of high rates of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other psychiatric disorders related to trauma exposure in people with serious mental illness. Routine trauma assessment and diagnostic evaluation with consideration of trauma is especially important to be completed for people with complicated treatment resistant illnesses. There is recognition that coercive mental health treatment environments are traumatizing, both overtly and covertly. The majority of mental health staff need much more information about trauma and its consequences in order to recognize it and treat it. Leadership must be responsible for provision of training to increase awareness about re-traumatizing practices used intentionally or unintentionally among staff, and in assessment and treatment of people with trauma histories. Leadership also develops or revises policies to assess and treat people with trauma histories, to avoid and eventually eliminate re-traumatizing practices.

4. CONSUMER ROLES
DDES encourages using consumers in roles such as providing peer support, being a peer advocate or a peer mentor. Consumers in various roles can provide support from the experiential perspective and offer unique insights into the process of recovery. Self-help, peer support, and self-advocacy are components of wellness and recovery and provide opportunities for consumer involvement. Other opportunities for consumers include operating a drop-in center and providing wellness education and recovery programs. It is the position of DDES that superior services can be provided when patients/consumers are helped to find appropriate peer support. Consumers have an important role in changing an organizational structure away from control and maintenance to one based in recovery, choice, and successful living.

5. DATA TO INFORM
Data is used to measure progress toward seclusion and restraint reduction, inform practice, and positively recognize incremental achievements for both treatment teams and patients/consumers. It is used to motivate, encourage, and support change, when provided in a timely manner. It is critical for leadership to actualize the culture change, to "walk-the-talk", of a positive culture of healing and recovery and to measure progress achieving this.

6. RISK ASSESSMENT
The purpose of risk assessment is to identify individuals or situations that may be more prone to anger, aggression or violence, as well as recognizing the physical and behavioral signs of impending aggression or violence. Risk assessments assist staff with identifying effective preventive interventions, while avoiding violence and coercive measures. In assessing risk, consideration is given to using a combined clinical judgment and statistical (rating scale). Current research suggests a structured clinical judgment and an assessment tool, focusing on the most well documented risk factors, is a promising approach to identifying risks of aggression or violence.

7. HEALTH PROMOTION
There is another side of the public health model, in addition to prevention, which is health promotion. Health promotion teaches and provides practice in health behaviors and alternatives skills to replace old problematic behavior patterns. Health promotion includes, but is not limited to, healthy living, health behaviors, developing self-esteem skills, healthy relationship skills, spirituality, and developing expressive and artistic skills. The goal is health promotion for the whole person.

C. SECONDARY PREVENTION

1. TRAUMA INFORMED TOOLS
Trauma-informed tools, are a set of secondary prevention tools designed to avoid or mitigate trauma and re-traumatization in treatment environments. This includes, for example, therapeutic communication strategies and the recognition and reduction of overt/covert coercion. Another example is providing a formal, trauma-sensitive, training program in advanced de-escalation skill development. De-escalation preference tool is a personalized crisis plan used to help the consumer during the crisis to avoid the need to use seclusion or restraints.

2. DISPUTE MEDIATION/RESOLUTION
Dispute mediation/conflict resolution is a continuum of processes which begins at the point when a potential problem is identified and extends through resolution using non-violent means. Within a mental health environment dispute mediation skills, once mastered, allow direct care staff to diffuse escalated situations more quickly. Institutes are encouraged to use these conflict resolution processes that assist in resolving disputes between staff, between staff and consumers, and between consumers. Provision of training in mediation skill development for staff and consumers, along with the development of a specialized Dispute Mediation and Resolution Crisis Team, is highly encouraged.

3. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT TOOLS
Physical and environmental modifications and tools have an important role in secondary prevention. Physical and environmental modifications, made with consideration to the consumers served, include sensory modification rooms and comfort rooms. Sensory modulation rooms assist consumers to regulate the degree, intensity, complexity, and nature of responses to sensory input. Comfort rooms are designed to provide sanctuary from stress and/or provide the consumer a place to experience feelings within acceptable boundaries.

D. TERTIARY PREVENTION

1. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
Administrative review is the process of elevating every seclusion and restraint event 24-hours a day, 7-days per week. This involves significant organizational changes in the level and importance of oversight, accountability, communication, and follow-through of every seclusion and restraint event.

Direct care Registered Nurses are expected to report every seclusion and restraint event to the Supervisor. The Supervisor leads an acute post-event analysis, gathers information, documents an event on a timeline, and interviews the charge RN, other involved staff, and the consumer. The Supervisor, after the fact gathering or "mini-root-cause-analysis" notifies the assigned Executive Staff Member with the information. The Executive Staff then calls the Unit RN for any additional information or clarification. The Supervisor sends the written report to the Executive Staff where the situation is reviewed, patterns identified, and changes suggested and discussed with the treatment team.

The goal of the Administrative Review is to increase the visibility of seclusion and restraint events, evaluate policies, procedures, unit rules, guidelines, and practices, that contributed to a situation, which escalated into seclusion and restraint, and to make necessary changes. The Administrative Review also identifies opportunities for staff training or re-training by noting patterns of increase in seclusion and restraint use by certain staff or groups of staff. While training or retraining is the preferred intervention, continued disregard or unwillingness to adopt the new philosophy by any staff member results in leadership action to address the employee's performance problem.

2. DEBRIEFING (Post Event Evaluation)
Debriefing is a stepwise tool designed to rigorously analyze a critical event like seclusion/restraint, to examine what occurred, and to facilitate an improved outcome next time. This could include the improvement in managing the events as they unfolded, or methods to avoid the event. The process of debriefing also provides an opportunity to assess the traumatic aspects of seclusion/restraint, how consumer and staff involved were affected and to identify any follow-up needed for either consumer or staff.

There are two types of debriefing. The first is an immediate "post-event" debriefing that includes a consumer interview. The focus of the "post-event" debriefing is survival, safety, security, returning to a pre-crisis milieu, and communication with administrative staff. There is a need for emotional support for the consumer directly involved in the situation, the staff, and consumer observers of the situation. The second type is a "formal debriefing" the next working day, which includes the consumer and member of the treatment team. The goal of "formal debriefing" is to identify clinical interventions for effective primary or secondary prevention of the situation. The results of both "post-event" and "formal debriefing" are used to consider revisions or changes to the treatment plan, treatment planning procedures, policies/procedures, staff training, staff competencies/skills, unit milieu/environment, staffing patterns, and/or communication procedures.

III. CONCLUSION

It is the Division of Disability and Elder Services belief that seclusion and restraint are not treatment, they are not therapeutic, and they reflect a failure of the therapeutic alliance between consumers and staffs. The goal of DDES is to emphasize the prevention of situations giving rise to crisis, and when they do occur, the crises are therapeutically de-escalated and evaluated. In those situations where seclusion/restraint have been used, there is a critical need debrief and analyze events that occurred so they can be prevented in the future. DDES recognizes and supports the changing standards of care, which focuses on the prevention, reduction, and eventual elimination of the need to use seclusion and restraint.

CENTRAL OFFICE CONTACT: 
Vaughn Brandt
Client Rights Office
1 West Wilson Street, Room 850
P.O. Box 7851
Madison WI 53707-7851
Phone: (608) 266-9369
FAX: (608) 266-2579
E-mail: brandv@dhfs.state.wi.us

MEMO WEB SITE: 
http://dhfs.wisconsin.gov/partners/local.htm

Return to Info Memos Index