DHS

 

Wisconsin Department of Health Services

Client Rights Home

Intro to Client Rights

Client Rights Office

Client Rights Training Opportunities

Client Rights Limitation or Denial

Community Grievance Decision Digest

Confidentiality of Treatment Records

Guardianship

Minors

Informed consent

Centers for the Develop- mentally Disabled

Mental Health Institutes

Secure Treatment Centers

Outpatient treatment

Inpatient treatment

Model Grievance Procedure

Forms, publications and posters

Non-Wisconsin residents who are emergency detained

Community Grievance Decision Digest

HUMANE ENVIRONMENT

THE LAW:

Each patient shall... "Have a right to a humane... physical environment within the hospital facilities.  These facilities shall be designed to afford patients with comfort and safety, to promote dignity and ensure privacy.  Facilities shall also be designed to make a positive contribution to the effective attainment of the treatment goals of the hospital."

§ 51.61(1)(m), Wis. Stats. [Emphasis added.]

"Treatment facilities shall provide patients with a clean, safe and humane environment..."

HFS 94.24(1), Wis. Admin. Code [Emphasis added.]

DECISIONS

1.      An inpatient complained about lack of interactions with staff during her six-day stay.  Each patient’s needs and perceptions are unique, and staff cannot use a “one size fits all” approach.  There is a thin line between respect for a patient’s privacy and choices (e.g. to not have many interactions with others and to be given personal space), and going too far in the other direction (e.g., in trying to probe for interaction with many questions).  In the latter instance, the patient could have complained that she was not respected and not given reasonable space or privacy. Here, the record reflects a reasonable degree of staff attentiveness and vigilance and, in the latter part of the stay, more discussion with her about issues.  It was concluded that the patient’s right to a humane psychological and physical environment was not violated in this circumstance. (Level III decision in Case No. 99-SGE-08 on 3/23/01.)

2.      The individual’s right to treatment includes specific protocols as necessary to ensure health and sanitary living conditions. The treatment needs of the client need to be considered and clearly documented in the contract between the county and any contract agencies, with a plan for monitoring and updating those treatment goals.  Any barriers to achieving these needs must be documented, the guardian must be informed, and a plan to resolve such issues needs to be implemented.  These treatment protocols are an essential feature for the treatment and management of the client, and they are an integral part of the client’s right to prompt and adequate treatment.  (Level III Decision in Case No. 03-SGE-04 on 6/15/04.)

3.      The sister/guardian of a woman filed a grievance about the care the woman had received while she was living in her own apartment.  She had been receiving supportive home care services from an independent service provider under a general contract with the county.  The guardian alleged “abuse of a vulnerable adult” because the woman’s apartment was not kept clean by the contractor and was “unlivable due to filth”.   The contract contained no specific requirements, but there was a list of duties for the staff who visited her apartment.  One duty was to clean the apartment weekly. During one particular period, the contractor’s employees did not complete many of the required items and the apartment became very dirty.  Instead, they spent the time providing companionship to the woman. Regardless of her desire for companionship, the employees were responsible for keeping the apartment clean. Whenever possible the caregivers should be making sure the task list is completed while working with the client to model those skills, and to create a social situation where tasks can be completed together and in a way that is therapeutic for her by reinforcing daily living skills. The contractor violated her right to a humane environment.  (Level III Decision in Case No. 03-SGE-04 on 6/15/04.)

4.      The county is ultimately responsible for the health and safety of a client to whom they provide services.  Even though they have a contract for an independent service provider to do the hands-on services, the contracted agency’s failure to perform its duties is also the county’s failure. The county must monitor the providers it contracts with in order to ensure that vital services are provided for their clients. (Level III Decision in Case No. 03-SGE-04 on 6/15/04.)

Last Updated: November 07, 2006